Maintenance Of Accounting Internal Controls Study Objective

accounting internal controls

Internal control, as defined in accounting and auditing, is a process for assuring achievement of an organization’s objectives in operational effectiveness and efficiency, reliable financial reporting, and compliance with laws, regulations and policies. A broad concept, internal control involves everything that controls risks to an organization.

  • More generally, setting objectives, budgets, plans and other expectations establish criteria for control.
  • Internal controls also make up the ongoing process of protecting an organization and its assets from fraud.
  • With the corruption of Enron and WorldCom, internal controls became more and more important.
  • This includes all rules, processes, and activities designed to improve operational efficiency and prevent financial statement irregularities.

The Securities and Exchange Commission founded the Financial Accounting Standards Board to develop the guidelines that all accounting professionals ought to follow. The FASB guidelines allow companies to provide financial accounting internal controls information in a transparent and useful manner, and this information can be of use when auditing and to investors. Internal controls can easily be categorized into three fundamental types, each serving its purpose.

Automating Internal Controls Audits With Pathlock

Consistently apply predefined business rules and perform complex calculations in processing large volumes of transactions or data. Risk assessment is the entity’s identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of its objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed. Detection controls attempt to uncover errors or irregularities that may already have occurred.

  • The auditor also should obtain sufficient knowledge of the means the entity uses to communicate financial reporting roles and responsibilities and significant matters relating to financial reporting.
  • Procedures directed toward evaluating the effectiveness of the design of a control are concerned with whether that control is suitably designed to prevent or detect material misstatements in specific financial statement assertions.
  • In some information systems, IT may be used to automatically transfer such information from transaction processing systems to general ledger or financial reporting systems.
  • Additionally, changing passwords frequently enables access controls to remain steadfast over time.
  • For example, when the nature of management incentives increases the risk of material misstatement of financial statements, the effectiveness of control activities may be reduced.

The auditor also should obtain sufficient knowledge of the means the entity uses to communicate financial reporting roles and responsibilities and significant matters relating to financial reporting. For example, when IT is used in an information system, segregation of duties often is achieved by implementing security controls. Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure that management directives are carried out. Implementingsegregation of dutieswhere duties are divided among different people, to reduce the risk of error or inappropriate actions. Key controls are those that must operate effectively to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. Preventive controlsattempt to deter or stop an unwanted outcome before it happens. The control types described below can be used in combination to mitigate risks to the organization.

The Pros & Cons On Requiring Reports On Internal Control

Failure to require supporting documentation evidencing business purpose to internal reviewers can result in inappropriate expenditures going undetected. Failure to provide supporting documentation with business purposes to external reviewers could result in disallowances, fines, penalties which have financial and reputational impacts for the University. Material weaknesses can render the financial data of a company unreliable and ineffective. They prevent auditors and stakeholders from reliably assessing the financial health of the company and determining its stock price. Fn 6 An auditor may need to consider controls relevant to compliance objectives when performing an audit in accordance with section 801, Compliance Auditing Considerations in Audits of Governmental Entities and Recipients of Governmental Financial Assistance.

accounting internal controls

The auditor also considers his or her assessment of inherent risk, judgments about materiality, and the complexity and sophistication of the entity’s operations and systems, including the extent to which the entity relies on manual controls or on automated controls. Internal control, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity’s control objectives. The likelihood of achievement is affected by limitations inherent to internal control. These include the realities that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes. For example, errors may occur in designing, maintaining, or monitoring automated controls. If an entity’s IT personnel do not completely understand how an order entry system processes sales transactions, they may erroneously design changes to the system to process sales for a new line of products. On the other hand, such changes may be correctly designed but misunderstood by individuals who translate the design into program code.

Internal Control System & The Detection & Prevention Of Fraud In An Organization

Often, an efficient board that has access to the company’s internal auditors can discover such fraud. People normally start out small and then work their way up until they have stolen hundreds of thousands of dollars, which can have a crippling effect on the business. They did not put into place proper internal controls, and were out hundreds of thousands of dollars before the person was finally caught. The employee had the ability to apply cash receipts, enter accounts payable, and cut accounts payable checks without anyone else having to get involved in the process. They ended up having to shut the company they had purchased down, causing many innocent people to lose their jobs. The function of an accounting department is to provide timely and accurate financial reports.

  • A common example of this in larger companies is the work done by internal auditors.
  • Intentional losses may be a case of fraud, and this makes it paramount for the separation to occur.
  • For example, the auditor may identify a “user review of an exception report of credit sales over a customer’s authorized credit limit” as a direct control related to an assertion.
  • For example, automating controls that are manual in nature can save costs and improve transaction processing.
  • Using this method, a business accounts for all materials that make up its physical holdings.

In a smaller entity, the influence of the chief executive, often an owner-manager, is usually more direct. In any event, in a cascading responsibility, a manager is effectively a chief executive of his or her sphere of responsibility. Of particular significance are financial officers and their staffs, whose control activities cut across, as well as up and down, the operating and other units of an enterprise. This type of control is designed to highlight any problems within a company’s accounting process. Detective internal controls are commonly used for things such as fraud prevention, quality control, and legal compliance. Examples of detective controls include an inventory count, internal audits, and surprise cash counts. Detective internal controls protect a company’s assets by finding errors when they occur so that business owners can minimize their impact on the company.


The most important control activities involve segregation of duties, proper authorization of transactions and activities, adequate documents and records, physical control over assets and records, and independent checks on performance. Internal control comes at a price, which is that control activities frequently slow down the natural process flow of a business, which can reduce its overall efficiency. Control activities can also be expensive, especially in terms of the extra time required by employees to perform them. Consequently, the development of a system of internal control requires management to balance risk reduction with efficiency. There are certain drawbacks of internal controls, despite its importance in accounting accuracy and operational efficiency. It is easy to circumvent internal controls, given that the effectiveness or performance of a company’s internal controls are left to the opinions and judgments of humans.

In addition, when evaluating the degree of assurance provided by evidential matter, the auditor should consider the interrelationship of an entity’s control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. However, such procedures are not sufficient to support an assessed level of control risk below the maximum level if they do not provide sufficient evidential matter to evaluate the effectiveness of both the design and operation of a control relevant to an assertion. Procedures directed toward evaluating the effectiveness of the design of a control are concerned with whether that control is suitably designed to prevent or detect material misstatements in specific financial statement assertions. Procedures to obtain such evidential matter ordinarily include inquiries of appropriate entity personnel; inspection of documents, reports, or electronic files; and observation of the application of specific controls.

When accounting documents such as inventory receipts, invoices, internal materials requests, and travel expense reports are standardized, this can help to maintain consistency in the company’s records. Standardized document formats also make it easier to review past records when a discrepancy has been found in the system. A detective control is an accounting term that refers to a type of internal control intended to find problems within a company’s processes. Internal controls are typically comprised of control activities such as authorization, documentation, reconciliation, security, and the separation of duties. Online (cloud-based) accounting systems are designed to be used via the Internet instead of on servers at specific business locations. The primary advantage of Internet-based systems is that there is no need for downloading software to your computers, backup, security or IT support for these applications.

Failure to provide documented evaluations could complicate later disciplinary processes. When duties cannot be sufficiently segregated due to the small size of a unit, it is important that mitigating controls, such as a detailed supervisory review of the activities, be put in place to reduce risks.

Policies & Procedures

An audit is an unbiased examination and evaluation of the financial statements of an organization. Internal controls with independent and objective third party reviews are critical. You should have an accounting professional diligently review bank statements, check registers, bank reconciliations and payroll records regularly.

accounting internal controls

From a quality standpoint, preventive controls are essential because they are proactive and focused on quality. However, errors and fraud can still exist in a double-entry accounting system, which is why trial balances should be used in conjunction with this method. Trial balances are a form of accounting control that infuse additional reliability into the system by keeping an internal record of credits and debits to allow businesses to identify issues early on. Preventive controls are intended to keep a loss from occurring in the first place. For example, a business could segregate certain duties and install physical protections for assets.

Accounting Information Systems: The Processes And Controls, 2nd Edition By

Separation of duties — This involves dividing bookkeeping, deposits, reporting, and auditing roles. Risk assessment — Risk assessment is basically the examination of possible risks with regard to objectives. It involves evaluating potential events and evaluating their likelihood of occurrence and finding a suitable way to respond to these risks. Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients.

  • Requiring approval for large payments and expenses can prevent unscrupulous employees from making large fraudulent transactions with company funds, for example.
  • Internal control, as defined in accounting and auditing, is a process for assuring achievement of an organization’s objectives in operational effectiveness and efficiency, reliable financial reporting, and compliance with laws, regulations and policies.
  • Internal control procedures should be put in place for all business operations to protect the company’s assets and minimize the risk of loss.
  • Or, a bank reconciliation is used to detect unexplained withdrawals from a savings account.
  • He knows that whether it’s good or bad, he has to report information that is truthful and accurate.
  • Based on the assessed level of control risk the auditor expects to support and audit efficiency considerations, the auditor often plans to perform some tests of controls concurrently with obtaining the understanding of internal control.

For example, use of a lockbox system for collecting cash or access controls, such as passwords, that limit access to the data and programs that process cash disbursements may be relevant to a financial statement audit. Conversely, controls to prevent the excess use of materials in production generally are not relevant to a financial statement audit.

This control is used to help correct balance discrepancies as quickly as possible. Risks and controls may be entity-level or assertion-level under the PCAOB guidance. However, a combination of entity-level and assertion-level controls are typically identified to address assertion-level risks. The PCAOB set forth a three-level hierarchy for considering the precision of entity-level controls. Later guidance by the PCAOB regarding small public firms provided several factors to consider in assessing precision.

The auditor should obtain sufficient knowledge of the control environment to understand management’s and the board of directors’ attitude, awareness, and actions concerning the control environment, considering both the substance of controls and their collective effect. The auditor should concentrate on the substance of controls rather than their form, because controls may be established but not acted upon. For example, management may establish a formal code of conduct but act in a manner that condones violations of that code. Internal control is influenced by the quantitative and qualitative estimates and judgments made by management in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of an entity’s internal control. The cost of an entity’s internal control should not exceed the benefits that are expected to be derived. Although the cost-benefit relationship is a primary criterion that should be considered in designing internal control, the precise measurement of costs and benefits usually is not possible. The first step in the process is to identify and group the major functions of accounting into specific buckets, such as general ledger, accounts payable, revenue, human resources/payroll, bank and cash, capital expenditures, and inventory.

Types Of Internal Controls Weaknesses And 5 Ways To Fix Them

The Board of Management is responsible for defining the scope and structure of the ICS at its discretion in accordance with § 91 AktG. Internal Audit is responsible for independently reviewing the functionality and effectiveness of the ICS in the Group and at Deutsche Telekom AG, and, to comply with this task, has comprehensive information, audit, and inspection rights. Deutsche Telekom AG’s internal control system is based on the internationally recognized COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework, COSO I, as amended on May 14, 2013. Ensure that adequate receipts are present and match all purchases shown on the cardholders’ monthly statement.If supporting documentation is not provided, request the cardholder to provide it or obtain a copy from the vendor. As you investigate each risk, add columns that show where the problem is, why controls are inadequate, who is responsible for a particular process, who identified the issue, what the solution is, and when the person responsible took action.

In many entities, internal auditors or personnel performing similar functions contribute to the monitoring of an entity’s activities. Monitoring activities may include using information from communications from external parties such as customer complaints and regulator comments that may indicate problems or highlight areas in need of improvement. In many entities, much of the information used in monitoring may be produced by the entity’s information system.

To maintain effective internal controls, management assesses and reviews procedures for controls. They are responsible for communicating any changes with staff regarding how controls are functioning and how they are implemented. Next, internal controls assist in ensuring that financial information is accurate, reliable and timely. A third reason that internal controls are important is because they help accounting professionals comply with federal, state and local business laws. To help in this goal, the Securities and Exchange Commission created the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which is also known as the FASB, to set the guidelines that all accounting professionals must follow.

Tags: No tags

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *